Uber Technologies Inc.‘s attempt to break up hundreds of aggregated sexual assault lawsuits from rideshare passengers got a cold reception before San Francisco federal appeals court panel at oral arguments Tuesday.
The rideshare app, which is facing nearly 1,500 assault suits in a consolidated multidistrict litigation, is arguing that its terms of service agreements with passengers prevents their cases from being litigated in a “consolidated” or “coordinated” manner.
But Uber’s arguments about how exactly the consolidation of those cases was a legal error appeared to confuse the three-judge panel US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
“That was …
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source link
